O
Orclever
Back to Journal
Research Article Open AccessOrclever Native

Mechanical and Environmental Comparison of Natural Fibers and Glass Fiber in the L-RTM Method

Nazmi Türkhan1,
Kübra Tuna2,
Hüseyin Arıkan3,
Yusuf Uzun4
1Polgün Waterparks& Attractions
2Polgün Waterparks& Attractions
3Necmettin Erbakan University
4Necmettin Erbakan University
Published:June 29, 2025

Abstract

The applicability of flax fiber-reinforced composites as an environmentally friendly alternative to glass fiber-reinforced plastics (GFRP), commonly used in outdoor structures such as water slides, has been investigated. While glass fiber is associated with high energy consumption and significant environmental impacts, flax fiber offers a sustainable solution due to its renewable nature, low density, and biodegradable properties. The mechanical and environmental performance of flax fiber-reinforced composites manufactured using the L-RTM (Light Resin Transfer Molding) method was evaluated, with a particular focus on sensitivity to water and moisture, and design considerations to mitigate these effects were discussed. In this method, L-RTM is employed as a vacuum-assisted, closed-mold technique particularly suited for medium-scale production of high-quality components with smooth surfaces on both sides. In this context, the essential conditions for natural fiber-reinforced composites to serve as a viable alternative to glass fiber in water slide applications have been identified.

Keywords
Glass fiberFlax fiberComposite materialL-RTMSustainability

References

  1. 1.Wambua, P., Ivens, J., & Verpoest, I. (2003). Natural fibers: Can they replace glass in fiber reinforced plastics? Composites Science and Technology, 63(9), 1259–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4DOI
  2. 2.Moudood, A., Rahman, A., Ochsner, A., Islam, M., & Francucci, G. (2019). Flax fiber and its composites: An overview of water and moisture absorption impact on their performance. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 38(7), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684419839874DOI
  3. 3.Composites One. (2020). Light RTM - Closed mold process. Composites One Technical Guides. https://www.compositesone.comLink
  4. 4.Easy Composites. (2021). Flax fibre reinforcement in composites – Advantages, disadvantages and processing. https://www.easycomposites.co.ukLink
  5. 5.Koronis, G., Silva, A., & Fontul, M. (2013). Green composites: A review of adequate materials for automotive applications. Composites Part B: Engineering, 44(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004DOI
  6. 6.Yan, L., Chouw, N., & Jayaraman, K. (2014). Flax fibre and its composites – A review. Composites Part B: Engineering, 56, 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014DOI
  7. 7.Holbery, M., & Houston, D. (2006). Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. JOM, 58(11), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0234-2DOI
Download PDF
Cite This Article
Türkhan, N., Tuna, K., Arıkan, H., Uzun, Y. (2025). Mechanical and Environmental Comparison of Natural Fibers and Glass Fiber in the L-RTM Method. *The European Journal of Research and Development*, 5(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd.v5i1.638

Bibliographic Info

JournalThe European Journal of Research and Development
Volume5
Issue1
Pages84–94
PublishedJune 29, 2025
eISSN2822-2296