O
Orclever
Back to Journal
Research Article Open AccessOrclever Native

IntelliOps: A Generic Multi-Source Monitoring Framework with Predictive Analytics for Enterprise Infrastructure

Alper Ozpinar1✉,
Muhammet Mustafa Alarçin2,
Volkan Halim3,
Hakkı Kıvanç Yeker4
1Istanbul Commerce University
2Papara
3Papara
4Papara
Published:December 31, 2024
DOI: 10.56038/ejrnd.v4i4.588
Vol. 4, No. 4

Abstract

This paper presents IntelliOps, a novel monitoring framework that integrates multi-source system monitoring with predictive analytics capabilities for financial technology infrastructure. The proposed framework aggregates performance metrics from multiple monitoring platforms and consolidates them through a unified API, providing comprehensive visibility into both hardware and software performance metrics. IntelliOps introduces an innovative approach by synthesizing traditional monitoring methodologies with advanced machine learning techniques, incorporating time series predictive models (LSTM, GRU, RNN) and contemporary forecasting libraries for anomaly detection and predictive maintenance.

The framework's architecture consists of three primary components: (1) a centralized data collection system that integrates heterogeneous monitoring sources, (2) an analytical engine that processes infrastructure and application-level metrics, and (3) a machine learning pipeline that performs predictive analysis on the aggregated data. Our implementation analyzes a longitudinal dataset spanning over one year from a large-scale fintech platform, encompassing metrics such as multi-layer response times (caching, message queuing, runtime environment, databases), request volumes, error rates, and deployment events.

Experimental results demonstrate the framework's efficacy in anomaly detection and predictive maintenance, achieving high accuracy across diverse datasets. The evaluation reveals that our hybrid methodology, incorporating both supervised and unsupervised learning techniques, yields superior performance in risk segmentation and anomaly detection compared to conventional threshold-based monitoring systems. Additionally, the integration of modern time series analysis techniques with classical statistical models enables robust detection of seasonal patterns and trends, facilitating proactive infrastructure management.

This research advances the field of systems monitoring by providing a structured methodology for implementing deep learning models in targeted monitoring scenarios, thereby enhancing system performance and mitigating potential disruptions across diverse operational environments. The framework's adaptability and scalability make it particularly suitable for complex financial technology infrastructures where system reliability and performance are paramount.

Keywords
Multi-source monitoringPredictive analyticsEnterprise infrastructureMachine learning pipelineAnomaly detectionTime series analysisLSTM/GRU/RNNInfrastructure managementDevOps monitoring

References

  1. 1.Awotunde, J. B., Adeniyi, E. A., Ogundokun, R. O., & Ayo, F. E. (2021). Application of big data with fintech in financial services. In Fintech with artificial intelligence, big data, and blockchain (pp. 107–132). Springer.
  2. 2.Bajao, N. A., & Sarucam, J. (2023). Threats Detection in the Internet of Things Using Convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory, and gated recurrent units. Mesopotamian Journal of Cybersecurity, 2023, 22–29.
  3. 3.Baresi, L., Garriga, M., & De Renzis, A. (2017). Microservices identification through interface analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10465 LNCS, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67262-5_2DOI
  4. 4.Bin, L., Chuang, L., Jian, Q., Jianping, H., & Ungsunan, P. (2008). A NetFlow based flow analysis and monitoring system in enterprise networks. Computer Networks, 52(5), 1074–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMNET.2007.12.004DOI
  5. 5.Campos, J. (2009). Development in the application of ICT in condition monitoring and maintenance. Computers in Industry, 60(1), 1–20.
  6. 6.Cassar, I., Francalanza, A., Aceto, L., & Ingólfsdóttir, A. (2017). A survey of runtime monitoring instrumentation techniques. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, EPTCS, 254, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.254.2DOI
  7. 7.Cerny, T., Donahoo, M. J., & Trnka, M. (2018). Contextual understanding of microservice architecture. ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review, 17(4), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183628.3183631DOI
  8. 8.Ciuffoletti, A. (2015). Automated Deployment of a Microservice-based Monitoring Infrastructure. Procedia Computer Science, 68, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.232DOI
  9. 9.Daoud, M., El Mezouari, A., Faci, N., Benslimane, D., Maamar, Z., & El Fazziki, A. (2021). A multi-model based microservices identification approach. Journal of Systems Architecture, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2021.102200DOI
  10. 10.de Toledo, S. S., Martini, A., & Sjøberg, D. I. K. (2021). Identifying architectural technical debt, principal, and interest in microservices: A multiple-case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.110968DOI
  11. 11.Dias-Neto, A. C., Matalonga, S., Solari, M., Robiolo, G., & Travassos, G. H. (2017). Toward the characterization of software testing practices in South America: looking at Brazil and Uruguay. Software Quality Journal, 25(4), 1145–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11219-016-9329-3DOI
  12. 12.Ekundayo, F., Atoyebi, I., Soyele, A., & Ogunwobi, E. (2024). Predictive Analytics for Cyber Threat Intelligence in Fintech Using Big Data and Machine Learning. Int J Res Publ Rev, 5(11), 1–15.
  13. 13.Hannousse, A., & Yahiouche, S. (2021). Securing microservices and microservice architectures: A systematic mapping study. Computer Science Review, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100415DOI
  14. 14.Jansen, B. J. (2006). Search log analysis: What it is, what’s been done, how to do it. Library & Information Science Research, 28(3), 407–432.
  15. 15.Kosinska, J., Balis, B., Konieczny, M., Malawski, M., & Zielinski, S. (2023). Toward the Observability of Cloud-Native Applications: The Overview of the State-of-the-Art. IEEE Access, 11, 73036–73052. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3281860DOI
  16. 16.Li, B., Springer, J., Bebis, G., & Hadi Gunes, M. (2013). A survey of network flow applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(2), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2012.12.020DOI
  17. 17.Lin, T.-T., & Siewiorek, D. P. (1990). Error log analysis: statistical modeling and heuristic trend analysis. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 39(4), 419–432.
  18. 18.Lin, Y. H., Shih, W. C., & Chang, Y. K. (2022). Efficient hierarchical hash tree for OpenFlow packet classification with fast updates on GPUs. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 167, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2022.04.018DOI
  19. 19.Meng, L., Ji, F., Sun, Y., & Wang, T. (2021). Detecting anomalies in microservices with execution trace comparison. Future Generation Computer Systems, 116, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.10.040DOI
  20. 20.Naiman, D. Q. (2004). Statistical anomaly detection via httpd data analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 45(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00115-4DOI
  21. 21.Ponce, F., Soldani, J., Astudillo, H., & Brogi, A. (2022). Smells and refactorings for microservices security: A multivocal literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111393DOI
  22. 22.Qassim, Q. S., Zin, A. M., & Ab Aziz, M. J. (2017). Anomaly-based network IDS false alarm filter using cluster-based alarm classification approach. International Journal of Security and Networks, 12(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSN.2017.081056DOI
  23. 23.Rezaei Nasab, A., Shahin, M., Liang, P., Basiri, M. E., Hoseyni Raviz, S. A., Khalajzadeh, H., Waseem, M., & Naseri, A. (2021). Automated identification of security discussions in microservices systems: Industrial surveys and experiments. Journal of Systems and Software, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111046DOI
  24. 24.Shinozawa, Y., & Vivian, A. (2015). Determinants of money flows into investment trusts in Japan. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 37, 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2015.02.005DOI
  25. 25.Shumway, R. H., Stoffer, D. S., & Stoffer, D. S. (2000). Time series analysis and its applications (Vol. 3). Springer.
  26. 26.Vale, G., Correia, F. F., Guerra, E. M., De Oliveira Rosa, T., Fritzsch, J., & Bogner, J. (2022). Designing Microservice Systems Using Patterns: An Empirical Study on Quality Trade-Offs. Proceedings - IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Architecture, ICSA 2022, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA53651.2022.00015DOI
  27. 27.Waseem, M., Liang, P., Shahin, M., Di Salle, A., & Márquez, G. (2021). Design, monitoring, and testing of microservices systems: The practitioners’ perspective. Journal of Systems and Software, 182, 111061. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSS.2021.111061DOI
  28. 28.Xia, H., Fang, B., Roughan, M., Cho, K., & Tune, P. (2018). A BasisEvolution framework for network traffic anomaly detection. Computer Networks, 135, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.01.025DOI
  29. 29.Xin, R., Chen, P., & Zhao, Z. (2023). CausalRCA: Causal inference based precise fine-grained root cause localization for microservice applications. Journal of Systems and Software, 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111724DOI
  30. 30.Zhang, M., Arcuri, A., Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Xue, K. (2023). White-Box Fuzzing RPC-Based APIs with EvoMaster: An Industrial Case Study. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 32(5). https://doi.org/10.1145/3585009DOI
  31. 31.Zhao, R., Wang, D., Yan, R., Mao, K., Shen, F., & Wang, J. (2017). Machine health monitoring using local feature-based gated recurrent unit networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 65(2), 1539–1548.
Download PDF
Cite This Article
Ozpinar, A., Alarçin, M. M., Halim, V., Yeker, H. K. (2024). IntelliOps: A Generic Multi-Source Monitoring Framework with Predictive Analytics for Enterprise Infrastructure. *The European Journal of Research and Development*, 4(4), 378-393. https://doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd.v4i4.588

Bibliographic Info

JournalThe European Journal of Research and Development
Volume4
Issue4
Pages378–393
PublishedDecember 31, 2024
eISSN2822-2296